RvR crest rolls.

It's very simple..

ONLY 60rr+ can select need on warlord crests. (you may select greed though, or pass)
ONLY 70+rr can select need on Royal crests.

The reason behind this being that in the alliance we have a number of players that are trying to get warlord or sovereign armour and the crest drops are so rare that it is unfair for someone to greed on them, only to break them down.

Conq/invader crests should not be needed on by high rr players either.

Officer crests however are still needed in very high numbers for warlord/sovereign armour so all are free to need on those.

On top of this if you do NOT need annihilator armour on a keep of less than four stars then please opt out. If you do NOT need conqueror armour on keeps of four stars plus then please opt out.

Our warband leaders will be keeping an eye on this.

Thanks

Afternoon folks.

just a quick comment, i was in an ally wb over the weekend and it was requested that anyone under RR45 not need for Invader crests also.
Not sure if thats a rule or just what that leader wanted so I thought it worth mentioning.

see you on the battlefield

Thrumgribon wrote:Afternoon folks.

just a quick comment, i was in an ally wb over the weekend and it was requested that anyone under RR45 not need for Invader crests also.
Not sure if thats a rule or just what that leader wanted so I thought it worth mentioning.

see you on the battlefield

Im in one where Invader are 50+
Can we get some clarification on rules please

As far as I am aware, having spoken to various people on this, the rules are as I stated.

Conq/invader not to be needed on OVER 60rr and warlord/royal not to be needed on unless 60/70rr.

I will speak to the other GLs to make sure of this situation.